Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 18 results ...

Brosque, C, Skeie, G and Fischer, M (2021) Comparative Analysis of Manual and Robotic Concrete Drilling for Installation Hangers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

BuHamdan, S, Duncheva, T and Alwisy, A (2021) Developing a BIM and Simulation-Based Hazard Assessment and Visualization Framework for CLT Construction Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Cherkos, F D and Jha, K N (2021) Drivers of Road Sector Public-Private Partnership Adoption in New and Inexperienced Markets. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Dias Barkokebas, R and Li, X (2021) Use of Virtual Reality to Assess the Ergonomic Risk of Industrialized Construction Tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

El Sayed, A Y, Darwish, M and Nassar, K (2021) Design and Constructability of Novel Extendable Arched Steel Truss Falsework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Hamledari, H, Sajedi, S, McCabe, B and Fischer, M (2021) Automation of Inspection Mission Planning Using 4D BIMs and in Support of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle–Based Data Collection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Kar, S and Jha, K N (2021) Investigation into Lead Time of Construction Materials and Influencing Factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Katsuragawa, C M, Lucko, G, Isaac, S and Su, Y (2021) Fuzzy Linear and Repetitive Scheduling for Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Kim, K and Cho, Y K (2021) Automatic Recognition of Workers’ Motions in Highway Construction by Using Motion Sensors and Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Liu, Y, Jarvamardi, A, Zhang, Y, Liu, M, Hsiang, S M, Yang, S, Yu, X and Jiang, Z (2021) Comparative Study on Perception of Causes for Construction Task Delay in China and the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Ma, G, Jia, J, Ding, J, Wu, M and Wang, D (2021) Examining the Impact of Social Media Use on Project Management Performance: Evidence from Construction Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Mahdavian, A, Shojaei, A, Salem, M, Yuan, J S and Oloufa, A A (2021) Data-Driven Predictive Modeling of Highway Construction Cost Items. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

O’Connor, J T, Shrestha, B K, Winkler, M and Ouk Choi, J (2021) Relationship between Commissioning and Start-Up Success Factors Achievement and Performance in Capital Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Raymond, A J, Kendall, A, DeJong, J T, Kavazanjian, E, Woolley, M A and Martin, K K (2021) Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Fugitive Dust Control Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Erosion; Fugitive dust control; Particulate matter (PM); Biogeotechnics; Sustainable construction; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA);
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001993
  • Abstract:
    Fugitive dust at construction sites reduces air quality and can affect respiratory health. Contractors must often use dust control strategies to meet environmental regulations for dust mitigation. Water application is the most common mitigation strategy, although alternatives such as magnesium chloride (MgCl2) are also used. Although these strategies reduce fugitive dust emissions at the site, they cause other environmental impacts onsite and off-site throughout their life cycle. A new approach to dust mitigation, enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP), has been developed to improve dust mitigation while reducing life cycle impacts. A life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) was performed to compare common dust mitigation strategies with EICP across a variety of environmental impacts and cost. LCSA has not previously been applied to dust mitigation strategies, so this work contributes new knowledge on the sustainability of existing and novel approaches to dust mitigation. The results show that EICP is potentially more sustainable than water application, particularly as watering frequency or persistence of the EICP treatment increases. Compared with MgCl2, EICP may be more environmentally intensive and more expensive. However, indicators for salinization of water and soil, impacts of concern for MgCl2, do not exist, making the comparison incomplete. It is anticipated that with further research and development focused on preventing EICP process emissions, enhancing the durability of EICP treatment, and reducing production costs, the technology will become more favorable for fugitive dust control.

Shirowzhan, S, Sepasgozar, S M E and Trinder, J (2021) Developing Metrics for Quantifying Buildings’ 3D Compactness and Visualizing Point Cloud Data on a Web-Based App and Dashboard. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Yoon, S, Weidner, T and Hastak, M (2021) Total-Package-Prioritization Mitigation Strategy for Deferred Maintenance of a Campus-Sized Institution. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Zhang, S, Jiang, P, Zhang, Z and Wang, C (2021) WebGIS-Based Collaborative Construction Quality Control of RCC Gravity Dam Using Sensing Devices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).

Zuniga-Garcia, N, Machemehl, R B, Khwaja, N A, Pruner, K D and Fu, M (2021) Estimation of Road User Costs for Work Zones in Data-Limited or Time-Constrained Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(03).